Dissecting Global Political Dynamics Through Geostrategic Shifts and Technological Convergence

NATO Expansion Line

In recent days, I have tried to explore and understand geopolitical affairs that led me to connect the dots surrounding the Ukraine War, the Zionist movement, and the recent situation in the Middle East. While appreciating many perspectives available online, I find myself exploring deeper and wider implications of current events. In this article, I will articulate my viewpoints, emphasizing 3 crucial elements often overlooked in current analyses in relation to – the broader objective of the Ukraine War; the impending convergence of digital technologies, and The Zionist movement.

A. Ukraine War: Unveiling Strategic Designs

NATO’s Eastward Expansion:

The Ukraine war is driven by a multifaceted agenda, with the primary objective being the control of Crimea, destabilization of Russia, and potential fragmentation of the Russian Federation into independent republic states. The initial step in this strategic plan involves the capture of Crimea by neutralizing the Russian base in Sevastopol. If Ukraine successfully secures control over Crimea and joins NATO, then Russia will collapse and Putin will be removed from power. The subsequent phase would entail the involvement of NATO forces in the region, extending their influence to encompass Georgia and Armenia under the NATO umbrella.

A broader geopolitical vision emerges from these actions, once Russia is out or contained from the caucus region then aspirations to realize the establishment of a Free Kurdistan State would be much easier. The envisioned scenario involves Turkey being expelled from NATO, leading to the declaration of independence by Kurdish people around the region to form a Kurdistan State – parts of Turkey, Syria, Iraq, and Iran. I think that is the primary reason for the continued presence of the U.S. military in Syria and Iraq, not for the oil and profits. 

A key assumption underlying my perspective is the potential destabilization of Russia or a scenario where President Putin is replaced by a pro-Western puppet. In such a situation, the path seems open for NATO and Zionist forces to proceed with their big objective – the creation of a Free Kurdistan state. The final ambition involves connecting this newly established Kurdistan state with Greater Israel in the Middle East. One side Kurdistan State will be connected with Armenia and the other side will be connected with Greater Israel. 

Boris Johnson’s Notable Utterance:

In the middle of 2022, Boris Johnson, the then-Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, articulated a vision for “New Europe.” His proposed concept envisioned a strategic alliance extending from Nordic states through the Baltic states, Poland, and concluding with Ukraine. The underlying objective, as suggested by Johnson, was to create a distinct geopolitical entity that would isolate the European Union from Russia. This envisioned New Europe would essentially establish a new border, reshaping regional dynamics.

Shortly after articulating this vision, Boris Johnson resigned from his position. The timing of his departure, coupled with the content of his proposed New Europe plan, I strongly think that Johnson may have been forced by the Zionists to resign due to the alleged leaking of a confidential and strategic initiative.

Johnson’s idea of New Europe, aimed at isolating the EU from Russia, is part of a more extensive and clandestine plan orchestrated by higher echelons of political power. Instead of merely isolating the EU from Russia, these purported masterminds have envisioned a grander scheme: the creation of a new NATO frontier line stretching between Europe and Asia. The implications of such a plan would be profound, potentially reshaping alliances, power structures, and geopolitical influences across Eurasia. A new NATO line in the proposed region could signify a strategic move to fortify the alliance’s presence and influence, exerting control over crucial territories and trade routes.

Future NATO Expansion Line

I think a complex interplay of geopolitical strategies, regional power shifts, and long-term goals that extend beyond the immediate context of the Ukraine war. The potential consequences of these actions could significantly reshape the geopolitical landscape in Eurasia and the Middle East.

Why does NATO want to expand to the caucus region?

The expansion of NATO into the Caucasus region is a complex geopolitical maneuver with several potential motivations. Here, I will explore three prominent reasons that would have justified NATO’s interest in extending its influence to this strategic area:

1. Historical Ties to the Khazar Khaganate:

One of the reasons NATO’s interest in the Caucasus region is linked to the historical roots of most Zionists in the Khazar Khaganate. The Khazars were a semi-nomadic Turkic people whose kingdom spanned the Caucasus region to Ukraine. The goal is to regain control over the historical Khazar region. The connection between these historical roots and the geopolitical ambitions of NATO raises questions about the naming convention “Caucasian” used by Europeans. I suspect the terminology suggests the possibility of deeper Zionist connections, beyond the classifications made by an anthropologist.

2. Economic and Trade Control Between Europe and Asia:

Strategic control over the economy and trade routes between Europe and Asia stands out as a compelling reason for NATO’s interest in the Caucasus. The region serves as a crucial crossroads for trade and commerce, linking the continents. Gaining influence in the Caucasus allows NATO to shape and control economic activities, fostering alliances and partnerships that could be advantageous in terms of trade, resource access, and economic influence.

3. Total Control of Western Europe’s Economy:

NATO’s expansion into the Caucasus could be driven by the ambition to exert total control over Europe, especially Western Europe’s economy and trading routes. By establishing a significant presence in the Caucasus region, NATO may seek to dominate key transportation arteries, ensuring a strategic advantage in the movement of goods and resources. This control over trading routes enhances NATO’s influence over economic dynamics, enabling the alliance to shape and secure its economic interests in Western Europe.

In summary, Zionist or NATO’s interest in expanding into the Caucasus region can be attributed to a confluence of historical ties, economic considerations, and the strategic control of crucial trading routes. Exploring the possibilities of these motivations provides insight into the geopolitical complexities driving the current Middle East situation. Another frontier in the Asia Pacific through QUAD is out of discussion in this article.

B. Convergence of Digital Technologies: Shaping Future Dynamics

The ongoing convergence of digital technologies, particularly in the field of Artificial Intelligence (AI), is poised to bring about a profound transformation in global economic models and power structures. Here are three key dimensions through which this evolution is set to unfold:

1. Redefining Power Structures:

The traditional notion that more wealth equates to more power is undergoing a paradigm shift. Recent directives from the World Economic Forum (WEF) underscore a new focus on accessing rather than ownership of digital models will contribute to consolidating and centralizing digital power in the hands of a selected few. The emphasis is on ushering in a surveillance economy, where control and manipulation through digitization and digital technologies become paramount. When digital space and AI can give a huge concentration of power with a hand of few, then the question arises – why do we need to spend money in every stage to manipulate and control? This marks a departure from historical money-bribing power control to technology-centric total control. 

2. Workforce Displacement and Universal Basic Income (UBI):

AI’s integration into various industries is anticipated to result in a significant displacement of the workforce. Many Western nations are already responding by piloting Universal Basic Income (UBI) programs. The COVID-19 pandemic, with its multifaceted goals, played a role in accelerating the shift towards a digital environment for daily life activities. Simultaneously, it facilitated the implementation of surveillance systems and had repercussions for small businesses and the middle class. The middle class, the mirror of society is diminishing at a historical speed in Western society after the COVID pandemic. As AI-driven automation progresses, mass populations may find themselves compelled to align with government and corporate mercy and guidelines to ensure their survival. It would end up controlling and manipulating mass pollution through the power of digital technologies managed and administered by a few. 

3. AI’s Military Frontiers:

The advent of AI will introduce massive new military frontiers, expanding the capabilities of armed forces. From autonomous military hardware to humanoid robots to AI-equipped animals like dogs, birds, and bees, the military landscape will start evolving rapidly. The AI-driven animal entities will emerge and will be fueled by advanced algorithms and computer vision to serve as military arsenals. For instance, AI-Birds could carry firearms and execute precision strikes, AI-Bees can be deployed as biological weapons to strike precise targets, and drones – with extended flight capabilities, could locate and engage targets over prolonged periods. The ongoing conflict in Ukraine serves as a testing ground for the deployment and experimentation of various AI-driven technologies on the battlefield. The continuation of the Ukraine War will result in a great rise in AI applications and use cases in military industries. 

The convergence of digital technologies, particularly driven by AI, will not be just a technological shift but a transformative force reshaping the very foundations of power, economies, military strategies, and societal structures. 

C. Zionist Dynamics: Navigating OCGFC and Non-OCGFC Realities

In analyzing the Zionist landscape, distinguishing between the Owner and Controller of Global Financial Corporations (OCGFC) and non-OCGFC factions is significant. While both groups share a common goal within the Zionist framework, disparities lie in their strategies and operational approaches. Consider them as two hands of a single body – left and right – working towards the same ultimate objectives.

Both faction’s ultimate goal is to maximize control of humanity. Historically, the OCGFC or the Left strategy is to stay hidden and controll through global institutes, governments, media corporations, and hi-tech digital companies. On the other hand, the goal of the right or non-OCGFC is to run the world through the land of Israel with Jerusalem as the capital. 

Convergence of OCGFC and Non-OCGFC

When digital space and AI can give a huge concentration of power with a hand of few, then the question comes, why do we need to spend money in every stage to maintain the power? Since digital convergence is allowing Zionists to control and manipulate digital life – socially and economically of the mass population, there is no reason to stay hidden and run the show. The power difference would be so huge that there is no need for any deceptive face or hidden agendas rather shows the world how powerful we are. So, Zionists across the board are strong proponents of massive digital convergence and extensive use of AI in every sphere of human life without going through any ethical considerations. When Benjamin Netanyahu spoke about AI and Israel’s leadership position in AI and its strategies at the last UN General Assembly, it also demonstrated his appeal to OCGFC factions to join together.

Ukraine War to Gaza Killing

The initiation and provocation of the Ukraine war originated from the OCGFC faction. Their strategic calculations led them to orchestrate this geopolitical event. I strongly think the Ukraine war was initially intended to commence in 2017 or 2018, with the goal of attacking Crimea (There was a video circulated on Twitter on John Mccain and Lindsey Graham talking about the imminent Ukraine war in a meeting with Ukranian soldiers in late 2016). However, due to circumstances, the plan faced delays, mainly because of Donald Trump’s presidency. 

The OCGFC’s broader goal through this war is to bring the NATO control line up to Armenia. The only obstacle for them is Vladimir Putin. They want to wait until Putin is removed from power. They focus on the leadership of a country, not a country as a whole as an enemy. 

On the other hand, the non-OCGFC and Benjamin Netanyahu group took the public position of wait-and-see. Russia’s presence in the Middle East and its support to Iran will not allow them to implement their master plan for the Greater Israel project. Netanyahu’s group was desperate to initiate the greater Israel project at first to ethnically cleanse Palestinians from Gaza and the West Bank, and then gradually control some Arab territories especially land grabs from Syria to connect with Free Kurdistan.

Non-OCGFC Zionists took the opportunity to leverage the October 7th, 2023 event as a pretext for advancing the Greater Israel project. Indiscriminately killing the mass population, blocking basic human supplies for survivability, and destroying infrastructures clearly show the ultimate goal of the Israeli Zionist regime is to expand. OCGFC Zionists, while not dismissing the Greater Israel project, disagree on the timing and success. They want to await specific conditions, including the collapse of Putin’s Russia, the maturation of digital convergence, and the AI military frontier. 

What is happening in the current situation is the convergence of OCGFC and non-OCGFC Zionists, aligning their strategies, priorities, and timing to achieve the ultimately shared goal of advancing the Zionist agenda to control humanity. As we navigate through these complex webs of geopolitical and technological developments, it becomes evident that the Zionist role through NATO in the Ukraine War is not isolated but intricately linked to broader strategic visions. The power of AI and the convergence of digital technologies is poised to redefine global power dynamics, challenging traditional economic models and military strategies. What is unfolding in front of our eyes is the collapse of veils of hypocrisy and the relationships between the Zionist factions and their paid support base. 

Shallow Insan

We strive to break the barrier of the superficial form of thinking to understand and explain complex and interrelated designed events and systems.

Leave a Reply

This Post Has 2 Comments

  1. Mizan

    This article aims to encourage a fresh perspective on geopolitics. Zionists are actively seeking to wield influence over global power dynamics. They have successfully cultivated relationships with politicians in the Western world, ensuring a level of control that allows them to receive unquestioning support for their actions on Palestine.